Trial feedback record

中文 · Exercise

This is a blank template, not evidence of an external trial. Record only observations. Mark skipped steps “not run”; a blank is not a pass.

Anonymous participant code / date:
Source: external participant / internal rehearsal (choose one)
Archive version / SHA256 / Python / operating system:
Data instance / task language / report language:
Total time / assistance received and what it involved:

Step	Verified / failed / not run / uncertain	Time	Expected versus actual behavior, error text or evidence file
Create environment and start
Explain both task rules
Run the approval-request task
Run the approved-execution task
Select an additional data instance (0.5.0 only)
Explain the intentional failure with JSON evidence
Read the integration interface

**Rule understanding:** What determines whether to wait or execute? Which wording is unclear?

**Failure explanation:** What was left incomplete? Were there prohibited attempts or actual violations? Which evidence paths support this?

**Integration obstacles:** What information or interface is missing? How much work would a next step require (unknown is acceptable)? No live model call is needed.

**Usefulness:** Have you encountered a similar error? Which decision would it affect? Would you repeat the same task to test a fix, and why? No purchasing commitment is requested.

**One change that would help most:**

Remove private paths, customer information, tokens and contact details before sharing attachments. The inviter collects feedback manually; this form sends nothing.